Pretext For Iraq War
1 + 1 = 2
1 = We know from Clarke, Woodward, the 9/11 commission, et al. that the Bush administration was looking to invade Iraq from Day One.
1 = We also know that the administration downplayed threat of Al-Qaida against the entreaties of informed staffers.
2 = Did the diabolical Bush hawks look the other way in the hope that foreign jihadists would provide pretext for their pre-emptive plans in Iraq?
Bush & Co. has been characterized by turning their backs. They have ignored the desires of American voters following a photo-finish(too nice?) election. Dismissed foreign governments working towards worldwide disarmament & reasonable environmental protocols. In their arrogance they even dismissed human rights accords that have been in place for decades.
President Bush was hoping for another terrorist strike. He wanted and expected another attack like the USS Cole or the Kenya bombings. A fair price to pay - according to his twisted logic - in American lives for a his bold new foreign policy agenda. The sheer magnitude of the attacks in New York took even Bush's imagination by surprise. Yet they played right into his hands.
2 Comments:
Bush can't do anything right. He is a total loser, incompetent and almost like a freak in the whitehouse, and millions of people in the red states are total morons who don't know what is 'really' going on.
PLEASE!! Will you give it a rest? All this negative crap toward Bush is just a bunch of emotional rhetoric put on by the liberal ideologs who are wrong.
He is by far one of the best presidents we have ever had.
You all are full of nonsense, and are not thinking rationally. You all are blinded by a bunch of lies you have been fed. You hear the facts, but deny them.
It is amazing to me!
September 8, 2005 at 1:40 PM
hmm--
your spouting is--um--interesting.
you say Bush is one of the best presidents we ever had. and you stop there. would you give us some examples, please?
the 'liberal, ideologs who are wrong' ARE giving examples: questionable elections, crimes against the people they're supposed to be protecting, a preemptive strike against a country that was later shown NOT to have the WMD's they swore were there--NOT to have ties to al-qaeda.
where are your facts as you espouse him as the 'best president we ever had?'
you're so quick to condemn what others say--but you won't stand behind what you say?
I notice you withheld your name. . .
November 4, 2005 at 9:36 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home